Wednesday, March 25, 2015

"Poor Boys Farm" Visual Rhetoric

Poor Boys Farm by Thomas Britt. 2005. USA. 13”x19,” Acrylic Paint.

Thomas Britt was raised and continues to live in rural Lafayette, Tennessee. He started painting at only seven years old while working on the farm with his grandfather. These early memories of being raised on the farm are his biggest influence and can be seen reflected in his art.

In this painting of Britt’s, his positive feelings toward farm life are instantly recognizable. Through the bright, but soft colors he is able to express the joy he found in his experiences working, fishing, and hunting with his family. The weather is portrayed as being very comfortable with a beautiful sunset just beginning to show. We see the tractors and farm equipment parked in the barn and someone is just returning from day working in the fields. As the boy returns, we see one of his dogs close to his side and can assume they spent the day together, while another waits excitedly for his master to return home.

The work conveys the warm atmosphere of a close-knit family who work together and spend their time together. The situation of sunset being close and those who were working returning home, seem to invite the assumption that the evening will be spent together, sharing the day’s details with one another. The clothesline and the old-style pickup truck also bring to mind that this painting takes place during “the good ol’ days” of America. Nostalgia permeates from Britt’s painting.

 Finally, after taking in the subject of the picture, it can be seen that beyond the small developed and cultivated fields surrounding the home, there is a rugged and untamed landscape. It would appear that this small family, with their young child (or children) has carved a life for themselves out of an undeveloped terrain. The title of this work, Poor Boys Farm, lends itself to the perception that life was not easy for these people. It was due to their hard work and ambition that they had ownership of their own small plot, and although they weren’t wealthy, they had something that was theirs.

One may derive from Thomas Britt’s painting that life on the farm is one to be cherished. Despite the many difficulties and challenges, there are many benefits to this way of life that far outweigh the negative aspects of it. The young boy spends his days in simple comforts unavailable to those who don’t live on the farm. Britt presents a very positive depiction of agriculture, and one that is accurate for many.

Sources:

Britt, Thomas. Poor Boys Farm. 2005. Karen’s Kollectibles. Shelby. Nebraska Antiques. Web. 25 March 2015.
“Thomas C. Britt Bio.” Nebraska Antiques. Karen Pandorf, n.d. Web. 25 March 2015.

Sunday, March 22, 2015

"Shane" Film Review

Shane (1953)
Director: George Stevens
USA
Running Time: 118 minutes
Awards: 10 Oscars

Summary:
Shane takes place in post Civil War Wyoming and focuses on the difficulties faced by homesteaders, especially in the struggle between the farmers and free-range ranchers. Farmers were pitted against these ranchers due to their desire to cultivate and develop the land. By fencing off the portions given to them by the U.S. government in the Homestead Act, farmers got in the way of the ranchers who had run their cattle in the area on the open range for years before they showed up.

The film begins with Shane, a “gunslinger,” passing peacefully through the Starrett’s homestead. He is seeking to leave behind his past and start a new life. The family is suspicious of him and asks him to leave their property.

Shortly after the family’s encounter with Shane, the audience is introduced to the rising tensions between Rufus Ryker, the rancher, and Joe Starrett, the patriarch of a small family of homesteaders. Ryker and his men show up on the Starrett land, informing Joe that they will be seeking to drive them and the rest of the “pig farmers” out of the area so that they may return to grazing their cattle on the land. Starrett is unmoved by their threats and makes up his mind to never give up his family’s farm, stating that to remove him, they’ll have to do it with him “in a pine-wood box.” Shane decides to help the family in their conflict.

Later Shane accompanies the Starrett family and a group of the other homesteaders into town as Starrett’s hired man. As the group purchases supplies at the general store, Shane goes to the saloon. He is met with hostility from Ryker’s men and a fight soon breaks out. As Shane handles the first of the men, the rest soon join in. Starrett jumps in to help Shane against the overwhelming odds and Ryker and his men are defeated by them. As they leave Ryker promises, “From now on when we fight them, the air will be filled with gun smoke.”

Ryker calls in Wilson, a gunfighter from Cheyenne, to help with the troubles he faces from the homesteaders. He soon makes good on his promise of violence when Wilson kills one of the farmers, Stonewall Torrey, in town.

After the incident with Torrey many of the homesteaders decide to abandon their dreams of developing the frontier for agricultural purposes. They are soon revitalized in their purposes, however, when Joe Starrett gives a rousing speech at Torrey’s funeral, stating that they are raising families, not homesteads or cattle such as Ryker.

The violence from Ryker continues as he begins to burn homesteads. He tries to recruit Shane and Starrett to his cause and as his partners, but to no avail. He invites Starrett into town to meet at the saloon and talk about things. Starrett knows it’s a trap but decides to go anyway to shoot it out. Joe’s wife tries to stop him from going and is joined by Shane. Joe and Shane begin to fight and Joe is knocked out. Shane then goes to town in his place, followed by Joey, Joe’s young son who idolizes Shane.

Shane walks into the saloon to face Ryker and Wilson. A gun battle soon follows, in which Shane kills both Ryker and Wilson. Joey, who is watching from underneath the saloon door, warns Shane of one of Ryker’s men hiding. The final gunman is killed but not before he injures Shane.

After the fight, Shane realizes that he will never be able to change who he is and decides to leave the area in peace, telling Joey, “there are no more guns in the valley.” As he then rides away, Joey is left calling after him, “Shane! Shane, come back!”

Analysis:
Scratching a living out of the land on the frontier was no easy task. There was always work to be done. A feud with those who preferred the status quo on top of that made it nearly impossible. The struggle seen in the film was not consolidated to just Wyoming, but all throughout the western frontier. It seems that the perceived attitude held common toward farmers (such as described by Chaucer) (Kinkead, Funda, and McNeill, 43) was abandoned when survival and self-interest is at stake. Naturally, those who had acquired a good living off the wild and unsettled frontier, like Ryker, preferred the status quo when their interests were threatened by the “newcomers,” no matter the stability and development they brought with them. The rousing speech given by Starrett at the film’s climax represents this notion. He speaks of the homesteaders as the embodiment of Chaucer’s plowman. They’re struggles on the frontier were for the purpose of raising their families, whereas Ryker only sought out his own self-interest and prosperity. A deeper meaning in his words may be that he and his peers had the purpose of bringing stability and development to the region, that through them future generations would be set up for greater success. If the homesteaders overcame the problems they faced there would be no need for their offspring to struggle as they did. The wounded Shane riding away to leave “no more guns in the valley” illustrates this notion best. The frontier was slightly less wild and dangerous, and could be faced with greater certainty. Because of these early pioneers, people can enjoy the comforts of modern times without having to produce their own food from the land. Much is owed to them.

Sources:

Kinkead, Joyce, Evelyn Funda, and Lynne McNeill. Farm: A Multimodal Reader. Fountainhead Press, 2014.


Shane. Dir. George Stevens. Perf. Alan Ladd, Jean Arthur, Van Heflin. Paramount Pictures, 1953. VHS.